ISSUES RAISED IN SWAGAT SCHEME OF COLLECTOR -AHMEDABAD

25-6-08 EMAIL TO COLLECTOR, REVENUE SECRETARY AND CHIEF SECRETARY

mody — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:53:44 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	12:34 pm (1½ hours ago)
	to		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” , secrev@gujarat.gov.in, csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	cc		pstocm@gujarat.gov.in
	date		Jun 25, 2008 12:34 PM
	subject		SOS MESSAGE FOR SWAGAT MEETING BY HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER ON 26TH JUNE 2008: KINDLY HAVE VALAUTION OF TIME AND EFFORT OF ELDERLY PERSON COMMING TO YOU FOR HIS GRIEVANCE
	mailed-by		gmail.com
FOR IMMEDIATE PERSONAL ATTENTION AND TOP MOST PRIORITY From Pankaj S Mody 2^nd Floor , Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006 Email modyps@gmail.com Mobile no 94270-26109 25^th June 2008, 1. The Chief Secretary, Gandhinagar 2. The Revenue Secretary , Gandhinagar 3. The Collector of Ahmedabad , Subash Bridge Respected Sir, Subject:- Instructions from the Office of the Chief Minister at Jansampark to Revenue Department and Collector office on 11-3-2008 regarding my objections on entry 5975 passed in Record of Right. The internet link of instructions is http://psmody.wordpress.com/category/cm-jansampark/11-3-08/ ————————————————————————————– This is in reference to my earlier emails and the same are annexed as per the link as under:- http://psmody.wordpress.com/2008/05/20/reminder-for-action-against-city-mamlatdar/ http://psmody.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/26-5-08-reminder-1-to-revenue-secretary/ http://psmody.wordpress.com/category/circle-inspector -assurance/27-5-2008/ http://psmody.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/29-5-08-email-to-chief-secretary/ I once again request you to be kind enough to furnish detailed reply to me as well as to the Office of Chief Minister at Jansampark by today evening so that the matter can be discussed with Honourable Chief Minister at his discretion in case Jansampark online Swagat programme is held tomorrow 0n 26^th June 2008 at Jansampark Office for public grievances and to introduce spirit of good governance as well as excellence. The email address is ustojs@gujarat.gov.in Your office had sufficient time to look into the matter and I sincerely hope that you lessen the burden on the Honourable Chief Minister who has to allocate his precious time for other priority matters concerning the welfare of the state as well as other citizens too.I do hope that your Office has valuation of his precious time and his health. It pains me that I have to approach the Honorable Chief Minister who has so many vital issues to attend and it is necessary that all of us conserve his energy and time so that he can utilize the same effectively and efficiently for welfare of the state. I urge your valued support once again. I do hope that your office do not take advantage of his large heartedness by remaining indifferent and irresponsible and unaccountable to him as well as to the voice of common people. Your valued support would be very much appreciated. It is the responsibility of all of us to take care of the well being of the Chief Minister. Let us not forget that all of us need Responsible Head of the Family as he has shouldered the responsibility of the Entire state while on the other hand I as Head of my family - am responsible to my own family members. In case you need the assistance of volunteer elderly citizen to help your office to serve common men, I am willing to offer my contribution in terms of time and experience ( preferably by using internet facility) for the welfare of the citizens of Ahmedabad . Please do not hesitate. Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email as well as your detailed online reply by today evening to me as well as to Office of Jansampark. Thanking you Yours most respectfully, Pankaj S Mody Copy of present email is marked separately to Jansampark Office today on 25^th June 2008. ENCLOSURE OF TODAY’S EARLIER EMAIL ———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: Jun 25, 2008 11:25 AM Subject: FOR IMMEDIATE PERSONAL ATTENTION AND TOP MOST PRIORITY To: csguj@gujarat.gov.in, secrev@gujarat.gov.in, “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” <collector-ahd@gujarat.gov.in> Cc: advtocm@gujarat.gov.in, pstocm@gujarat.gov.in, sec2cm@gujarat.gov.in, aksias@rediffmail.com FOR IMMEDIATE PERSONAL ATTENTION AND TOP MOST PRIORITY From Pankaj S Mody 2^nd Floor , Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006 Email modyps@gmail.com Mobile no 94270-26109 25^th June 2008, 1. The Chief Secretary, Gandhinagar 2. The Revenue Secretary , Gandhinagar 3. The Collector of Ahmedabad , Subash Bridge Respected Sir, Subject:- Instructions from the Office of the Chief Minister at Jansampark to Revenue Department and Collector office on 11-3-2008 regarding my objections on entry 5975 passed in Record of Right. The internet link of instructions:- http://psmody.wordpress.com/category/cm-jansampark/11-3-08/ ——————————————————————————- This is in reference to my earlier email and the same is annexed as per the link as under:- http://psmody.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/reminder-for-28-2-08-letter/ I once again request you to be kind enough to furnish detailed reply to me as well as to the Office of Chief Minister at Jansampark by today evening so that the matter can be discussed with Honourable Chief Minister at his discretion in case Jansampark online Swagat programme is held tomorrow at Jansampark Office for public grievances and to introduce spirit of good governance as well as excellence. The email address is ustojs@gujarat.gov.in Your office had sufficient time to look into the matter and I sincerely hope that you lessen the burden on the Honourable Chief Minister who has to allocate his precious time for other priority matters concerning the welfare of the state as well as the citizens too. It pains me that I have to approach the Honorable Chief Minister who has so many vital issues to attend and it is necessary that all of us conserve his energy and time so that he can utilize the same effectively and efficiently for welfare of the state. I urge your valued support once again. I do hope that your office do not take advantage of his large heartedness by remaining indifferent and irresponsible and unaccountable to him as well as to the voice of common people. Your valued support would be very much appreciated. It is the responsibility of all of us to take care of the well being of the Chief Minister. Let us not forget that all of us need Responsible Head of the Family as he has shouldered the responsibility of the Entire state while on the other hand I as Head of my family - am responsible to my own family members. In case you need the assistance of volunteer elderly citizen to help your office to serve common men, I am willing to offer my contribution in terms of time and experience ( preferably by using internet facility) for the welfare of the citizens of Ahmedabad . Please do not hesitate. Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email as well as your detailed online reply by today evening to me as well as to Office of Jansampark. Thanking you Yours most respectfully, Pankaj S Mody Copy of present email is marked separately to Jansampark Office today on 25^th June 2008. – pankaj s mody Every blow in life pierces the heart and awakens our feelings to sympathize with others; and every swing of comfort lulls us to sleep, and we become unaware of all. – pankaj s mody

20-6-08 email to Collector and Revenue Secretary

mody — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:10:13 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	Jun 20 (5 days ago)
	to		secrev@gujarat.gov.in, “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
	cc		ustojs@gujarat.gov.in, rg-hc-guj@nic.in, csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	date		Jun 20, 2008 10:05 AM
	subject		TAKRARI NODH PROCEEDINGS 74/2007 IN ENTRY 5975 BY CITY MAMLATDAR AND INSTRUCTIONS BY JANSAMPARK OFFICE ON 11-3-2008
	mailed-by		gmail.com

From :- Pankaj S Mody ,

2^nd Floor , Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

Mobile no- 94270-26109

20^th June 2008

To,

1) The Revenue Secretary

2) The Collector of Ahmedabad

Respected Sir,

Reference details :- http://sites.google.com/site/jansampark159539/

This is in reference to various correspondence with City Mamlatdar and the Collector Office as well as personal attendance in the Swagat Program of the Collector Office.
The Office of Jansampark of the Honourable Chief Minister of Gujarat has been kind enough to give necessary to give necessary directions to look into the matter regarding property claimed to acquired by Hare Krishna Developers from Span Medicals Ltd.
As the City Mamlatdar has not taken into consideration my pending Civil Suit 5827 of 2001 and as the spririt of directions given by Honourable Justice Jayant Patel in SCA 16255 of 2006 has not been complied by the City Mamlatdar , I am bringing the present communication to the notice of the Gujarat High Court as well as to Jansampark office by email today.
Kindly furnish copy of reply to Gujarat High Court with a copy of detailed reply marked to me latest by 23^rd June 2008.
Your cooperation would be very much appreciated as I may have to bring it to the notice of Gujarat High Court on account of indifference of the Office of the Collector Office.

Thanking you.

Yours most respectfully,

REMINDER FOR 28-2-08 LETTER

mody — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:24:37 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 29 (1 day ago)
	to		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
	cc		secrev@gujarat.gov.in
	bcc		csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 29, 2008 4:28 PM
	subject		My letter dated 28-2-08 submitted in swagat meeting of collector in February 2008.
	mailed-by		gmail.com

From :- Pankaj S Mody

2^nd Floor, Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

May 29, 2008

The Collector of Ahmedabad

Collectorate office

Shubhash bridge

Ahmedabad

Respected Sir,

REFERENCE letter dated 28-2-08 :- http://psmody.wordpress.com/category/swagat-collector-february/28-2-08/

This is in reference to my letter dated 28-2-2008 submitted at the time of Swagat programme at collector office in February 2008 in relation to takrari nodh proceedings 74/07 with City Mamlatdar. The said letter is available on the above referred internet link.

By now the collectorate office would be read with detailed observations and findings in this regard.

I do expect that my emails and letters are given due importance instead of being filed away or dumped or ignored by your office. You would be kind enough to appreciate that the property rights are important rights and hence due diligence is expected from your office.

I humbly request you to be kind enough to furnish a copy of same to me.

Thanking you

Yours most respectfully,

Pankaj S Mody
–
pankaj s mody

Every blow in life pierces the heart and awakens our feelings to sympathize with others; and every swing of comfort lulls us to sleep, and we become unaware of all.

email to chief secretary

mody — Thu, 29 May 2008 16:07:23 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 29 (1 day ago)
	to		csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	cc		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
	bcc		secrev@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 29, 2008 3:59 PM
	subject		FOR SOS REMINDER TO COLLECTORATE OFFICE Fwd: FOR URGENT AND IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF CITY MAMLATDAR IN THE MATTER OF CASE 74/2007 PERTAINING TO CHADAVAD
	mailed-by		gmail.com

From :- Pankaj S Mody

2^nd Floor, Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

May 29, 2008

The Chief Secretary,

Government of Gujarat

Gandhinagar

Madam,

Kindly refer to my email dated 9^th October 2007 referring my written submissions to City Mamlatdar (with a copy marked to you). The said written submissions are part of takrari nodh proceedings 74/07.
However, there is no reference of my written submissions in the Order passed by City Mamlatdar on 9^th October 2007. This means that my written submissions are ignored and just filed away.
I humbly request you to be kind enough to make on the spot inquiry by seeking observations of City Mamlatdar in writing while marking a copy of the same to me within next forty eight hours failing which it would be assumed that you do not have tight control on the administration of Gujarat.
As a Chief Secretary of the State it is expected of you to BE ruthlessness and persistent while dealing with various departments so that they deal the issues of common citizens coming to them with due care and responsibility especially when it involves property rights.
I would also like to refer that your past instructions to the Collectorate as regards to my various emails are not being pursued by the Collectorate office and as your office does not have suitable method of monitoring and supervising the instructions, your good intentions and efforts are being wasted. Kindly ask some one to monitor the progress by email and phone call on daily basis to the Collectorate office my various emails to you immediately.
Kindly mark a copy of email /letter sent to the Collectorate office and City Mamlatdar as the City Mamlatdar has the habit of hiding vital instructions from above.
I am marking a copy of the present email to the Collector office and I expect the collector office to give reply by email forthwith. When I as a sixty year old person is able to sit on the internet to type out by email , they can very well attend to my emails promptly by email.
I look forward to your follow up action.

Thanking you.

Yours most respectfully,

Pankaj S Mody

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 9, 2007 12:47 PM
Subject: FOR URGENT AND IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF CITY MAMLATDAR IN THE MATTER OF CASE 74/2007 PERTAINING TO CHADAVAD
To: “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” <collector-ahd@gujarat.gov.in>
Cc: secrev@gujarat.gov.in, csguj@gujarat.gov.in, cmgujarat@gujarat.gov.in, narendrabhai d modi <cm@gujaratindia.com>

SUBMISSIONS TO THE CITY MAMLATDAR IN THE MATTER OF 74/2007 RELATING TO CHADAVAD

From : Pankaj S Mody

2nd Floor Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Society

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

October 9 , 2007

City Mamlatdar,

Collector Office

Near Subhash Bridge

Ahmedabad

MADAM,

SUBJECT:- PENDING DISPUTE NO 74 OF 2007 BETWEEN PANKAJ MODY AND HAREKRIHSNA DEVELOPERS REGARDING PASSING OF ENTRY 5975 IN RECORD OF RIGHT 7/12 AS REGARDS TO FINAL PLOT 768/10 ADMEASURING 3065 SQMETERS AND LOCATED IN TP SCHEME 3/5 VARIED , CHADAVAD .

REFERENCE CORRESPONDENCE:- DATED 25/1/2006,6/2/2007, 20/4/2007 7/5/2007 , 16/5/07 and 30/5/07 to Talati/City Mamlatdar) and reply dated 13/2/2007 of Talati/Circle inspector taking note of Civil Suit 5827 of 2001)

====================================================================

Harekrishna Developers has furnished the following to Ms Meenaben Vyas ADVOCATE of Pankaj S Mody (present lawyers of Pankaj S Mody- the OBJECTOR) on 29-9-2007 being copies of documents submitted by them previously to Honorable City Mamlatdar:-

I. Copy of order dated 30-11-2006 in Civil Application 12472 of 2006(between Span Medicals Limited and Oriental Bank of Commerce)

II. Copy of Order of Bhadra City Civil Court dated 8-4-2003 and Exhibit 5 dated 31-12-2001 in Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 (being documents relating to Interim Stay).

III. Copy of affidavit dated 25-1-1995 made by Shri Suresh S Modi and Smt Nalini S Modi.

IV Written Opinion of A C Damani and Advocates dated 4-8-2007 to M/s Harekrishna Developers.

V The above four documents were annexed to the letter of M/s Harekrishna Developers addressed to City Mamlatdar dated 11-9-2007.

My REPLY as regards to above documents are stated as hereunder:-

I . Copy of order dated 30-11-2006 in Civil Application 12472 of 2006 in LPA 808 of 2006 (between Span Medicals Limited and Oriental Bank of Commerce) :-

1. Span Medicals Ltd had filed SCA 1333 of 2005 against Oriental Bank of Commerce in February 2005 to restrain the Bank from disposing Final Plot 768/10 (hereinafter referred was the disputed property) unknown to me . On 16-1-2006 an order was passed in said SCA 1333 of 2005 and the said order was challenged by Span Medicals Limited by filing OJ Appeal 808 of 2006 before Division Bench against Oriental Bank of Commerce. All these were unknown to me as I was not joined as a party. When I came to know of these matters, subsequently, I filed Civil Application 12472 of 2006 in OJ Appeal 808 of 2006 with a formal request to join as a party in the OJ Appeal 808 of 2006. My such application (to be joined) was declined by the Honorable Court vide Order dated 30-11-2006, copy of which document is above numbered FIRST document.

2. M/s Harekrishna Developers in the above letter dated 11-9-2007 to City Mamlatdar has in the paragraph 2 thereof wrongfully stated what is stated therein. My Civil Suit no. 5827 of 2001 in Bhadra City Civil Court is still pending Trial and which is between myself and six defendants, one of which is Span Medicals Ltd. Harekrishna Developers have not produced herein any Order from Bhadra City Civil Court and/or High Court that my said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 has been fully heard at its trial and disposed off and/or dismissed. In the said Civil Suit nO 5827 of 2001 , Span Medicals and Oriental Bank of Commerce are interalia defendants and I am the plaintiff and the suit is STILL PENDING SINCE 2001. Therefore, I have not lost the said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 interalia against Span Medicals Ltd, as is asserted by Harekrishna Developers.

3. IN FACT AND IN TRUTH, Harekrishna Developers have purchased the said disputed property with the knowledge of my Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 subject to outcome of said Civil Suit 5827 of 2001. The said property’s ownership is in dispute since 2001, if not from before. M/s Harekrishna Developers has hidden this aspect from the Honorable City Mamlatdar (of they having purchased the said disputed property in 2007 with the knowledge that the said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 (pertaining thereto) is pending. To that extent, Harekrishna Developers’ right as purchasers (if any, which is not admitted) is subject to outcome of said Civil Suit of 5927 of 2001.

4. Harekrishna Developers’ open-eye purchase in 2007 of the said property with disputed ownership and with my Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 (relating to the same) not having been disposed off at its trial(which will be in future) gives them a tainted right as such purchasers. . They are and should be fully aware of the same. Yet by making their application here by their said letter dated 11-9-2007 to your good self , they are attempting to mislead you into making a prejudicial entry (in land register) in face of my said Civil suit No 5827 of 2001. Their such conduct is highly deplorable, to say the least.

5. Alternatively , if your good self is disposed to making any such prejudicial entry or decision in face of my said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 then to protect myself ,yourself and your office, you should first demand and obtain from Harekrishna Developers suitable Monetary Bond or Financial Instrument to the extent of the present value of the said disputed property so as to satisfy the judgment of said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 in the event , the same is decided in my favor, in future. Such Monetary Bond or Financial instrument should be issued by leading Nationalized Bank and to be issued in my and your favor pending outcome of my pending Civil Suit 5827 of 2001. I am prepared to accept such Monetary Bond or Financial Instrument subject to consent of Bhadra City Civil Court Trial judge in my said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001.

II. Order dated 8-4-2003 and notice of motion under Exhibit 5 on 31-12-2001.

The Notice of Motion was mine applying for a stay order till the trial of the said Civil Suit 5827 of 2001. The Honorable Judge by his Order dated 8-4-2003 did not grant my such application. This, however, does not mean that my said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 has been disposed off and /or dismissed off. EVEN NOW, my said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 is STILL PENDING in the City Civil Court at Bhadra, Ahmedabad.

III. Affidavit filed by Shri Suresh S Modi and Smt Nalini S Modi on 25-1-1995 :- It has been stated in the said affidavit that Shri Suresh S. Modi and Smt. Nalini S. Modi were granted residence for life and they have vacated the bungalow (namely the aforesaid disputed property) and have relinquished their right of residence to Rupmanglam Investment Private Limited.

My reply on the above aspect are as hereunder:-

1. Shri Sureshbhai Modi and Smt Modi should have vacated the said property and handed over possession of the same simultaneously to Rupmanglam Investment Pvt Ltd. This fact ought to have been recorded in the Minute Book Record of the said Limited company . The said affidavit does not show that they handed over their such possession to said Limited Company. This can only become evident upon inspection and perusal of minute book of Rupmanglam Investment Pvt Ltd which Harekrishna Developers ought to have produced.

2. The validity of the said affidavit dated 25-1-1995 is highly questionable and cannot be taken as final proof of the facts stated therein.

3. This affidavit has not been filed by my opponents (Span Medicals Ltd.) in my Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 as they well know that the facts of such said affidavit has no connection to the said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001.

4. The production of the above highly questionable affidavit by Harekrishna Developers to you is, it is humbly submitted, is purely to mislead your good self , beside prejudicing me.

5. Further, Harekrishna Developers’ failure to give all the above information (relating to the said affidavit) is deplorable and amounts to serious misconduct vis-à-vis unto yourself.

IV. Written Opinion of A C Damani and Advocates dated 4-8- 2007 to M/s Harekrishna Developers

HareKrishna have submitted their lawyers ( Mr. A.C Damani’s) opinion( dated 4-8-2007 addressed to themselves) to your good self with their aforesaid letter dated 11-9-2007 with the nefarious intention of entering their names as such purchasers in the land registrar record.

My submissions on the above aspects are as follows:-

1. The above opinion of (Mr. A.C. Damani is mainly related to their matter with Municipal Corporation as is evident from paragraph 5 of the said opinion and is related to my another Civil Suit No 963 of 2007 interalia against HareKrishna Developers. The said opinion has NO EFFECT on the validity and/or viability of my previous Civil Suit 5827 of 2001 WHICH IS STILL PENDING SINCE 2001 and in which Harekrishna Developers are NOT a party. In the said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001, Span Medicals Ltd. and Oriental Bank of Commerce are two of many such defendants. In my said second civil Suit No 963 of 2007, Harekrishna Developers is one of many defendants wherein Span Medicals Ltd. is not a party.

2. (a)The above opinion of Mr. A. C. Damani has no relevance in the present proceedings before your good self,(the City Mamlatdar). If, at all, your good self want to be guided by any legal opinion, then it is submitted that you should obtain legal opinion of Advocate General of Gujarat and not of any private lawyers’ opinion and certainly not to be guided by such opinion of any lawyers of any parties appearing before you.

2.(b)I am given to understand by my lawyers and do verily believe that any Government Department and/or Civil Servants , whenever they require to obtain legal opinion in conduct of their duties, they have to obtain Advocate General’s opinion or Ministry of Law’s opinion and not be guided by private lawyer’s opinion. In the instant case, the private lawyer (Mr. A C Damani) has not given any opinion to you at your request but has given such an opinion to their clients (Harekrishna Developers). Consequently, you should not take any notice of such an opinion which is one sided and biased in favor of M/s Harekrishna Developers and cannot be considered a neutral opinion.

3. (a) The above opinion of (Mr. A.C. Damani is mainly related to Harekrishna Developers’ matter with Municipal Corporation as is evident from paragraph 5 of the said opinion and wherein my another Civil Suit No. 963 of 2007 interalia against HareKrishna Developers is referred to and commented upon.

3.(b) Mr. A C Damani being an advocate should know the difference between a trial judge and a motion judge (a judge hearing motion application). Yet for reasons known only to himself, he has misled his own clients (Harekrishna Developers) who in turn by producing Mr. A.C. Damani’s said opinion is attempting to mislead you (albeit whether innocently or deliberately , only they can tell).

4.(a) Further I have not been silent relating to said Civil Suit No 5827 of 2001 as alleged by Mr. A C Damani in his aforesaid opinion. On an inspection of index of court record of said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 that it can be ascertained and found that I have made an application therein which was heard and disposed in my favor in 2006 and I have been waiting for the said City Civil Court to frame the issues in the said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001.

4.(b) I demand that Mr. A.C.Damani ,as an advocate do produce to your goodself requisite Order of City Civil Court at Bhadra stating that Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 has had a full trial and has been disposed off and/or dismissed prior to the purchase in 2007 by Harekrishna Developers of the said disputed property.

4(c) In fact, Mr. A.C. Damani as an Advocate fully knows that my Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 is still valid and extant (i.e . Alive) and pending Trial in Bhadra City Civil Court.

5. It is not known whether Mr. A.C. Damani (Advocate) were solicitors who did title search of the above property for Harekrishna Developers as purchasers before they bought the said disputed property.

6. It is also not known whether Mr. A.C. Damani made a note of the presence of my Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 and Notice of Lis Pendens pertaining to said disputed property registered with Sub-Registrar of Assurances , Paldi in 2004. (if he or his firm did title search of the said disputed property).

7. The said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 is still pending in City Civil Court at Bhadra and the matter is SUBJUDICE. This fact is very well known to Mr. A.C.Damani as an Advocate, if If he or his firm made proper title search for Harekrishna Developers as proposed purchasers prior to any sale deed being executed by Span Medicals in their favour.

8. In the said opinion , Mr. A.C.Damani as an Advocate has interalia WRONGFULLY opined on my conduct (at paragraph 4 thereof ) when they do not know me nor I them . The said opinion has been made to prejudice myself not only with Harekrishna Developers but with any person to whom the said opinion is handed out or published. I have exercised my legal rights in commencing both the said Civil suits and my lawyers will explain to your goodself if necessary and if required by you, why one civil suit was filed in 2001 and another in 2007 relating to the same property (being aforesaid disputed property).

9. I am further advised by my lawyer and do verily believe that Harekrishna Developers ought not to have made public the said opinion of Mr. A.C. Damani, Advocate by handing the same to your good self (either original or a copy). Such handing over amounts to publication of the said opinion unto yourself and which amounts interalia to my defamation by Harekrishna Developers. I am taking further advice of my lawyers and will proceed accordingly hereafter.

10. (a) My other legal adviser has advised me on perusal of documents submitted by Span Medicals lt in the said City Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 (relating to the said disputed property) and have come to conclusion that even Span Medicals Ltd. did not obtain legal ownership of the said disputed property from its sellers. If Mr. A. C. Damani or his firm had made proper title search (of the said disputed property), they would have also come to same conclusion and would have advised their clients (Harekrishna Developers) NOT TO PROCEED with their purchase of said disputed property.

10(b) Yet, Harekrishna Developers proceeded with such tainted purchase. Now they want your goodself to register them as the legal owners of the said property by making suitable entry in the land records. Their such conduct is not only highly suspect but also amounts to grave misconduct vis-à-vis to your good self as well as myself it amounts to creating new proprietary rights through your good self when the said disputed property is subjudice as trial of my said Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 is still pending in the Bhadra City Civil Court wherein Harekrihsna Developers are not a party.

10 (c) Harekrishna Developers by their such application as per their letter dated 11-9-2007 to your good self is wrongfully attempting to persuade you to act in place of Bhadra City Civil Court by trying to obtain (through your goodself) proprietary rights which they have not obtained from Span Medicals Ltd. This I humbly submit, you should not do.

11. Whether title search by Mr. A C Damani or any other lawyers ( who made title search ) on behalf of Harekrishna Developers is correct and valid , only the courts can decide and not your goodself.

IN CONCLUSION , the aforesaid letter of Harekrishna Developers dated 11-9-2007 to your goodself and their aforestated four documents (handed to you) has been made with nefarious intentions and amounts to seriously prejudicing interalia your goodself. Further it amounts to seriously prejudicing my Civil Suit No. 5827 of 2001 wherein Harekrishna Developers are not a party.

It is unfortunate that your good self has informed Mr. Deepak Vyas , Advocate ( then appearing for Pankaj S Mody- the OBJECTOR) ON 3 RD October 2007 that you are not going to hold a hearing in this matter anymore and that you are only prepared to receive my written reply to Harekrishna Developers aforesaid documents submitted to you. My reply is contained in the preceding paragraphs of this letter. By your such assertions of not holding a hearing in this matter, you have unfortunately seriously prejudiced my right to be heard and on my behalf my lawyers to address you on various issues herein. Further, my rights to further proceed on appeal have been seriously impaired and prejudiced. All these amount to serious breaches interalia of rules of natural justice.

————

PANKAJ S MODY

DATED:- 9^TH OCTOBER 2007

Copy marked to 1) The Collector of Ahmedabad 2) The Revenue Secretary 3) The Chief Secretary 4) The Honorable Chief Minister of Gujarat ( in reference to the directions given to the Home Department to conduct impartial and detailed inquiry) 5) The Registrar, Bhadra City Civil Court.

29-5-08 email to chief secretary

mody — Thu, 29 May 2008 11:23:28 +0000

rom	pankaj mody
to		csguj@gujarat.gov.in
cc		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
bcc		secrev@gujarat.gov.in
date		Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:59 PM
subject		FOR SOS REMINDER TO COLLECTORATE OFFICE Fwd: FOR URGENT AND IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF CITY MAMLATDAR IN THE MATTER OF CASE 74/2007 PERTAINING TO CHADAVAD
mailed-by		gmail.com

hide details May 29

From :- Pankaj S Mody

2^nd Floor, Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

May 29, 2008

The Chief Secretary,

Government of Gujarat

Gandhinagar

Madam,

Kindly refer to my email dated 9^th October 2007 referring my written submissions to City Mamlatdar (with a copy marked to you). The said written submissions are part of takrari nodh proceedings 74/07.
However, there is no reference of my written submissions in the Order passed by City Mamlatdar on 9^th October 2007. This means that my written submissions are ignored and just filed away.
I humbly request you to be kind enough to make on the spot inquiry by seeking observations of City Mamlatdar in writing while marking a copy of the same to me within next forty eight hours failing which it would be assumed that you do not have tight control on the administration of Gujarat.
As a Chief Secretary of the State it is expected of you to BE ruthlessness and persistent while dealing with various departments so that they deal the issues of common citizens coming to them with due care and responsibility especially when it involves property rights.
I would also like to refer that your past instructions to the Collectorate as regards to my various emails are not being pursued by the Collectorate office and as your office does not have suitable method of monitoring and supervising the instructions, your good intentions and efforts are being wasted. Kindly ask some one to monitor the progress by email and phone call on daily basis to the Collectorate office my various emails to you immediately.
Kindly mark a copy of email /letter sent to the Collectorate office and City Mamlatdar as the City Mamlatdar has the habit of hiding vital instructions from above.
I am marking a copy of the present email to the Collector office and I expect the collector office to give reply by email forthwith. When I as a sixty year old person is able to sit on the internet to type out by email , they can very well attend to my emails promptly by email.
I look forward to your follow up action.

Thanking you.

Yours most respectfully,

Pankaj S Mody

SUBMISSIONS TO THE CITY MAMLATDAR IN THE MATTER OF 74/2007 RELATING TO CHADAVAD

From : Pankaj S Mody

2nd Floor Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Society

Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

October 9 , 2007

City Mamlatdar,

Collector Office

Near Subhash Bridge

Ahmedabad

29-5-08 second reminder to revenue secretary

mody — Thu, 29 May 2008 10:48:07 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 29
	to		secrev@gujarat.gov.in
	cc		csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 29, 2008 3:27 PM
	subject		SOS REMINDER TWO Fwd: SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY :- Fwd: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLAT
	mailed-by		gmail.com
———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: May 26, 2008 2:57 PM Subject: SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY :- Fwd: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE F To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY FROM :- PANKAJ S MODY 2ND FLOOR , JANMANGAL APT 40 BRAHMAN MITRA MANDAL SOCIETY PALDI , AHMEDABAD 380006 EMAIL :- modyps@gmail.com May 26 2008 The Revenue Secretary, Government of Gujarat GANDHINAGAR GUJARAT Respected Sir, Kindly refer to my earlier email dated 20th May 2008 which has not been replied by you till date. I once again request you to be kind enough to provide your detailed reply promptly BY EMAIL latest by tomorrow afternoon I do hope that your secretary would be kind enough to immediately acknowledge receipt of present email to me Thanking you Yours most respectfully Pankaj S Mody Enclosure of email

27-5-08 EMAIL FOR CITY MAMLATDAR

mody — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:15:46 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 27 (3 days ago)
	to		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
	cc		csguj@gujarat.gov.in, secrev@gujarat.gov.in, ustojs@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 27, 2008 4:05 PM
	subject		SOS URGENT MESSAGE TO CITY MAMLATDAR AND CIRCLE OFFICER -CHADAVAD IN RELATION TO LETTER 159539/2008 DATED 11-3-08 OPF JANSAMPARK OFFICE OF CHIEF MINISTER
	mailed-by		gmail.com

THE COLLECTOR OFFICE IS HUMBLY REQUESTED

TO PASS ON THE MESSAGE TO CITY MAMLATDAR AS THEIR INWARD SECTION DOES NOT PASS ON THE CORRESPONDENCE TO CITY MAMLATDAR IN LIGHT OF EXPERIENCE IN DEALING WITH CITY MAMLATDAR’S OFFICE.

FROM:- PANKAJ S MODY

EMAIL modyps@gmail.com

27-5-2008

To,

The City Mamlatdar-Ms MAMTA SOJITRA

SUBHASH BRIDGE

GANDHINAGAR

MADAM,

I have addressed letter to Circle Officer – Chadavad today on 27-5-2008 and have submittted the same by hand delivery.

This letter is for your knowledge so that the circle officer does not delay the investigation nor create any excuse

Yours sincerely,

Pankaj S Mody

By Hand Delivery

Pankaj S Mody

2^nd Floor, Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

27-5-2008

The Circle Officer,

Madalpur

Ahmedabad

Respected Sir,

Subject:- Final Plot 768/10 T P Scheme 3 – Chadavad admeasuring 3065 sqmeters and takrari nodh 74/07 in that regard.

——————————————————————————

Kindly note that the Office of Jansampark of the Chief Minister of Gujarat vide their letter dated 11-3-2008 has informed me that they have taken up the matter with the Revenue Department.
I would like to bring it to your attention that the City Mamlatdar had ordered detailed investigation vide communication dated 5-6-2007 ( outward no 2686) pursuant to my objection letter dated 30-5-2007.Kindly accord top priority for conducting detailed inquiry on Harekrishna Developers, Span Medicals and their associates including chartered accountants of Span Medicals Ltd,etc.
The then Circle Officer ( Mr. Jhalarvadia, if I am not mistaken) at the relevant time , I believe has not taken steps to carry investigation and furnish copy of the findings to me.
In case the City Mamlatdar or the Collector of Ahmedabad has instructed you in writing to restrain you from carrying out investigation kindly furnish a copy of the same to me forthwith.
I urgently request you to be kind enough to extend your support for carrying out detailed investigation in this regard and make a copy of the same made available to me forthwith.
A copy of the present letter is being sent to the Office of the Jansampark of the Honourable Chief Minister of Gujarat.
I do hope that you would be kind enough to inform the Revenue Secretary as well as the Chief Secretary of Gujarat in case the Office of the Collector has stopped you from carrying on detailed inquiry in this regard with a copy marked to me especially when the instructions have been issued by the City Mamlatdar.
Kindly note that your failure to give valid written explanation to me may go against you in case the Collector office dumps the responsibility on you for inaction on your part.
I do hope that you would understand the seriousness of the subject

Thanking you.

Yours sincerely,

Pankaj S Mody

Copy of present Letter 1) The Chief Secretary of Gujarat

2) The office of Jansampark of the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Gandhinagar-by email

3) The City Mamlatdar through email to the Collector

27-5-2008 email meant for City mamlatdar

mody — Tue, 27 May 2008 10:58:47 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 27
	to		“COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD”
	cc		csguj@gujarat.gov.in, secrev@gujarat.gov.in, ustojs@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 27, 2008 4:05 PM
	subject		SOS URGENT MESSAGE TO CITY MAMLATDAR AND CIRCLE OFFICER -CHADAVAD IN RELATION TO LETTER 159539/2008 DATED 11-3-08 OPF JANSAMPARK OFFICE OF CHIEF MINISTER
	mailed-by		gmail.com
*THE COLLECTOR OFFICE IS HUMBLY REQUESTED* *TO PASS ON THE MESSAGE TO CITY MAMLATDAR AS THEIR INWARD SECTION DOES NOT PASS ON THE CORRESPONDENCE TO CITY MAMLATDAR IN LIGHT OF EXPERIENCE IN DEALING WITH CITY MAMLATDAR’S OFFICE.* FROM:- PANKAJ S MODY EMAIL modyps@gmail.com 27-5-2008 To, The City Mamlatdar-Ms MAMTA SOJITRA SUBHASH BRIDGE GANDHINAGAR MADAM, I have addressed letter to Circle Officer – Chadavad today on 27-5-2008 and have submittted the same by hand delivery. This letter is for your knowledge so that the circle officer does not delay the investigation nor create any excuse Yours sincerely, Pankaj S Mody By Hand Delivery Pankaj S Mody 2^nd Floor, Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006 Email modyps@gmail.com 27-5-2008 The Circle Officer, Madalpur Ahmedabad Respected Sir, Subject:- Final Plot 768/10 T P Scheme 3 – Chadavad admeasuring 3065 sqmeters and takrari nodh 74/07 in that regard. —————————————————————————— 1. Kindly note that the Office of Jansampark of the Chief Minister of Gujarat vide their letter dated 11-3-2008 has informed me that they have taken up the matter with the Revenue Department. 2. I would like to bring it to your attention that the City Mamlatdar had ordered detailed investigation vide communication dated 5-6-2007 ( outward no 2686) pursuant to my objection letter dated 30-5-2007.Kindly accord top priority for conducting detailed inquiry on Harekrishna Developers, Span Medicals and their associates including chartered accountants of Span Medicals Ltd,etc. 3. The then Circle Officer ( Mr. Jhalarvadia, if I am not mistaken) at the relevant time , I believe has not taken steps to carry investigation and furnish copy of the findings to me. 4. In case the City Mamlatdar or the Collector of Ahmedabad has instructed you in writing to restrain you from carrying out investigation kindly furnish a copy of the same to me forthwith. 5. I urgently request you to be kind enough to extend your support for carrying out detailed investigation in this regard and make a copy of the same made available to me forthwith. 6. A copy of the present letter is being sent to the Office of the Jansampark of the Honourable Chief Minister of Gujarat. 7. I do hope that you would be kind enough to inform the Revenue Secretary as well as the Chief Secretary of Gujarat in case the Office of the Collector has stopped you from carrying on detailed inquiry in this regard with a copy marked to me especially when the instructions have been issued by the City Mamlatdar. 8. Kindly note that your failure to give valid written explanation to me may go against you in case the Collector office dumps the responsibility on you for inaction on your part. 9. I do hope that you would understand the seriousness of the subject Thanking you. Yours sincerely, Pankaj S Mody Copy of present Letter 1) The Chief Secretary of Gujarat 2) The office of Jansampark of the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Gandhinagar-by email 3) The City Mamlatdar through email to the Collector – pankaj s mody

26-5-08 reminder 1 to revenue secretary

mody — Mon, 26 May 2008 10:37:46 +0000

from		pankaj mody	hide details	May 26
	to		secrev@gujarat.gov.in
	cc		csguj@gujarat.gov.in
	date		May 26, 2008 2:57 PM
	subject		SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY :- Fwd: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE F
	mailed-by		gmail.com
SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY FROM :- PANKAJ S MODY 2ND FLOOR , JANMANGAL APT 40 BRAHMAN MITRA MANDAL SOCIETY PALDI , AHMEDABAD 380006 EMAIL :- modyps@gmail.com May 26 2008 The Revenue Secretary, Government of Gujarat GANDHINAGAR GUJARAT Respected Sir, Kindly refer to my earlier email dated 20th May 2008 which has not been replied by you till date. I once again request you to be kind enough to provide your detailed reply promptly BY EMAIL latest by tomorrow afternoon I do hope that your secretary would be kind enough to immediately acknowledge receipt of present email to me Thanking you Yours most respectfully Pankaj S Mody Enclosure of email ———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:19:36 +0530 Subject: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR P To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in, “A.K.Sharma (IAS)” <sectocm@gujarat.gov.in>, ustojs@gujarat.gov.in From:- Pankaj S Mody 2nd Floor, Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006 Email modyps@gmail.com Dated 20th May 2008 To , The Revenue Secretary Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar Respected Sir, Your reference letter:- HKP-202008-1028-J dated 30th April , 2008 pursuant to letter from collector office dated 8-4-2008 bearing reference cb/land/1/chadavad/2008/1 in relation to my letter dated 26-3-2008 in relation to takrari nodh 74/07 pertaining to entry 5975 and 4913. . Reference letter:- Jansampark reference letter vide 159539/2008 dated 11-3-2008 from the Jansampark office of the Chief Minister. My earlier correspondence with the collector office is available on www.psmody.wordpress.com . ————————————————— 1. Kindly refer to your letter brief letter dated 30–4-2008. My earlier email dated 26-3-2008 is annexed herewith for ready reference. 2. I am totally dissatisfied by the brief reply given by the Revenue Department. 3. It is apparent from your reply that your reply is a stereo reply forcing me to incur cost on appeal on account of serious breaches negligence of the City Mamlatdar. 4. I have approached the Collector office under their swagat scheme to point point out the serious breaches of the City Mamlatdar. 5. I look forward to your independent detailed observations regarding the contents of my earlier representation under SWAGAT SCHEME which would have been done by now. 6. The City Mamlatdar Ms Mamta Sojitra must* have a remarkable stroke of genius* in her in case she has studied my written submissions on 9thOctober 2007 and pass the Order the same day on 9 th October 2007. The said written observations on 9th October 2007 are already on taken on record of 407 pages of documents in takrari nodh 74/07. 7. Kindly furnish detailed observations to myEMAILS instead of a brief reply with a copy marked to me by tomorrow noon and to the Secretary to the Chief Minister and the Office of Chief Minister at Jansampark so that the issue can possibly be discussed in the upcoming Jansampark program being possibly held on 22nd May 2008 , Thursday. 8. A copy of the present email is being marked to the Collector of Ahmedabad so that he can submit his own independent observations to my various representations in the emails under Swagat scheme of Collector. 9. I humbly request you to be kind enough to let me know in detail as to why the initiative should be not taken by the Collector office and Revenue department for quashing the order passed by the City Mamlatdar and steps taken to protect my rights in the property as the construction has been commenced by Harekrishna Developers. 10. The then collector- Mr Diwedi during the Swagat meeting in March 2008 had informed to me that vigilance inquiry is being conducted on the conduct of City Mamlatdar- Mamta Sojitra. I feel those were just soothing words to console me. The inquiry has to be swift the way Harbhajan Inquiry was concluded recently in the world of cricket as reported in news papers. Under the present circumstances, to start with she needs to pay for all my legal expenses for appeal. This does not come cheap and it really pinches when the person is broke. Even a mentally strong person has to begin considering the option of committing suicide. This is what is the Collector office is suggesting to protect the corrupt City Mamlatdar like Mamta Sojitra. 11. I am the last person to accept the stereo routine reply of the Revenue Department for filing an appeal .I have come under Swagat scheme of the Collector for rectifying glaring and obvious gross negligence and misconduct of the City Mamlatdar. In case, you as a learned Revenue Secretary is not able to see the glaring negligence and misconduct of the City Mamlatdar, then the best thing is to gracefully opt for other departments. 12. The Collector office is taking advantage of the goodness of the Honorable Chief Minister. What the Collector office needs is wrath and fury of Ms Indira Gandhi whereby the shivers run down the spine of the staff under the Collector office. 13. As a concerned citizen, I do not wish the image of caring Hon’ble Chief Minister of Gujarat getting tarnished on account of Trojan Horse ( one can easily make out from the conduct of the City Mamlatdar Mamta Sojitra) in the Collectorate office especially when Shri Narendrabhai treats all the citizens of Gujarat as part of his family. Thanking you. Yours most respectfully, Pankaj S Mody ———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: Mar 26, 2008 7:39 PM Subject: Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR PURSUANT TO QUESTION 47 AND 48 RAISED IN FEBRUARY SCHEME OF SW To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in, secpers@gujarat.gov.in, seclegal@gujarat.gov.in, ustojs@gujarat.gov.in From :- Pankaj S Mody 2nd Floor, Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Society Paldi, Ahmedabad 380006 Email modyps@gmail.com Mobile* no 94270-26109* March 26, 2008 The Revenue Secretary Government of Gujarat Gandhinagar Respected Sir, SUBJECT:- Letter from the Chief Minister’s office regarding Entry 5975 and Entry 4913, 1. This is in reference to the letter dated 11-3-08 received from the Office of Jansampark of the Collector vide reference no 15953. The same is annexed herewith for reference as per the internet link http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev 2. I am marking copy of the correspondence with the Collector Office under their Swagat programme for your independent observations , reference and remarks. The correspondence with the Collector can be referred on my blogsite internet link:- http://psmody.wordpress.com/ . Your office can download the pages for ready reference as well read the messages online. 3. In this connection , I am drawing to your attention that the City Mamlatdar has primarily ignored the entry 4913 present in the Record of Right at the time of so called sale deed on 2-4-2007 . This is pertaining to the stay of the Revenue Department. As long as this entry was present in the record of right, the City Mamlatdar ought not to have passed any further entries and in particular that of sale deed entry 5975 without examining various issues in detail . I am afraid that this is not done. This also shows that the City Mamlatdar considers herself to be above the Revenue Department and does not have any regard for the Revenue Department which is above her position. Such attitude of the City Mamlatdar cannot be tolerated at all by the Revenue Department at all. 4. Secondly, the City Mamlatdar has totally ignored the spirit of directions given by the Gujarat High Court as regards the registration of Lis Pendens in the revenue records in light of the Orders passed by Order passed by the Honourable Justice of Gujarat High Court Mr.Jayant Patel passed on 4-8-2006 The same is annexed herewith for you ready reference in form of internet link http://del.icio.us/mody08/swagat-annexure-21The City Mamlatdar considers herself to be superior to Gujarat High Court which is absurd. On account of negligence of the City Mamlatdar and the Collector the entire bunglow has been demolished by Harekrishna Developers who has misled and suppressed vital facts to obtain favourable orders. . 5. I am also referring to other gross misconduct on the part of City Mamlatdar as referred on the internet link so that you can immediately form an independent opinion and bring it to the notice of the Honorable Chief Minister so that Honorable Chief Minister. The internet link is annexed herewith for your ready reference * http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-gist* 6. As a precautionary measure and as an interim measure , it is absolutely necessary that you would be kind enough to take immediate measures to protect my interest in the property on account of the pending civil suit filed by me especially when the Sessions Court has issued notices to the promoters of Span Medicals Limited to attend the Court proceedings ( Span Medicals who in turn sold this property to Harekrishna Developers- the subject matter of the entry 5975). It is absolutely necessary that you take lightining steps to seal the property and hold the same in the custody of the Collectorate as an interim measure preferably by tomorrow as I foresee other parties pouncing on this property so as to cause multiplicity of proceedings for me one after the other to protect my rights. 7. I am extremely disappointed that the City Mamlatdar is not concerned at all when the company is being High jacked in guise of amalgamation with the help of Bunty aur Bubbly team ( starring Abhishek and rani mukherjee) in real Life . 8. A copy of this correspondence will be brought to the notice of the Gujarat High Court in case you decide to extend support to the serious and gross breaches of violation of the City Mamlatdar and take the matter lightly. 9. The copy of the email is also being marked to Jansampark for their information. 10. Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email and be kind enough to furnish your observations as every second and minute is important for me. Therefore treat this as most important and most urgent. 11. I do expect that you are able to size up the situation immediately especially when the City Mamlatdar could dictate the Order on 9th October 2007 within one to two hours of receipt of my written submissions on 9th October 2007 itself.- a remarkable achievement and a stroke of extraordinary genius -, if I may say so !!!!. Thanking you. * Yours sincerely, * * Pankaj S Mody * ———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: Mar 26, 2008 2:21 PM Subject: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR PURSUANT TO QUESTION 47 AND 48 RAISED IN FEBRUARY SCHEME OF SWAGAT To: “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” <collector-ahd@gujarat.gov.in> ( WITH HUMBLE REQUEST TO READ THE LETTER ON INTERNET ITSELF DIRECTLY SO AS TO IMMEDIATELY SIZE UP THE SITUATION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY) From:- PANKAJ S MODY 2ND FLOOR, JANMANGAL APT 40 BRAHMAN MITRA MANDAL SOC * PALDI, AHMEDABAD 380 006* Email modyps@gmail.com ** Mobile* no 94270-26109 * * * March 26, 2008 To, The Collector of Ahmedabad Collector Office Subhash* Bridge*** Ahmedabad * * * NOTE:- ( WITH HUMBLE REQUEST TO READ THE LETTER ON INTERNET ITSELF * DIRECTLY SO AS TO IMMEDIATELY SIZE UP THE SITUATION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY) ** * * Respected Sir, * * SUBJECT:- IN RELATION TO QUESTION 47 AND 48 PURSUANT TO MY PETITION LETTER DATED 5-2-2008 UNDER SWAGAT SCHEME OF COLLECTOR OF AHMEDABAD * * REFERENCE LETTER:- Chief Minister’s Office communication dated 11-3-08 (file number 159539/08) ( INTERNET LINK:- * http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev) is pertaining to the entry 4913 and 5975 in record of right passed by City Mamlatdar on 9th October 2007 under takrari nodh 74/07. * SOME OF REFERENCE INTERNET LINKS* :- * * * DETAILS INTERNET LINK 30-5-07 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-30-5-07** 9-10-07 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/swagat-annexure-24 5-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-5-2-08** 26-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-26-2-08** 27-2-08 reply http://del.icio.us/mody08/27-2-08-FROM-MAMLAT 28-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-28-2-08** 14-3-08 LETTER and major annexures link http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-14-3-08-mam http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-14-3-08-annex-link * Gist of complaint against city mamlatdar * http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-gist * * Summary of communication to collector in SWAGAT SCHEME http://del.icio.us/mody08/sum-com-q47-q48 * * ————————————————- 1. This is in reference to the meeting held under Swagat Program by you on 28-2-08 in relation to my questions 47 and 48.During the meeting, I had given very important letter dated 28-2-08 to you IN PERSON so that you are able to probe the matter minutely WHEREBY you can get insights of how the system works in the Collectorate office to perform SWAGAT TO BUILDER COMMUNITY such as Harekrishna Developers. I am eager to have your detailed findings in relation to my above letter dated 28-2-2008. * * 2. I have also received recently from the Chief Minister’s Office communication dated 11-3-08 (file number 159539/08) which is pertaining to the entry 4913 and 5975 in record of right. The letter from Office of the Chief Minister is as per the internet link as :- * http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev* * * 3. As discussed on 28-2-08 during the meeting with you, I have already sent on 14-3-08 comprehensive complaint against present City Mamlatdar- Ms Mamta Sojitra on account of the orders passed on 9th October 2007 in relation to Takrai Nodh 74/07 in favour of Harekrishna Developers. The said letter dated 14-3-08 had minor errors and hence the said letter has been rectified while revised copy was sent on 18-3-08 by email to you and was also hand delivered in the Collector Office on 19-3-08.I have also given my observations and remarks to the reply given by the City Mamlatdar on 27-2-08 in my letter dated 14-3-08 in the enclosure thereto. It was necessary for the office of City Mamlatdar as well as the Talati and Circle Inspector to warn Span Medicals and others so that the property do not get sold or demolished in light of Lis Pendens registered with the Sub Registrar office as [part of Good Governance measures especially when assurance was given by the Circle officer on 13-2-07 that they are not going to pass any fresh entry by taking note of presence of my pending Civil Suit. * * 4. * I am posting the letter dated 14-3-08 annexing most of the enclosures by way of internet links so that you are simultaneously able to quickly assess and size up the subject matter effectively on online INTERNET itself especially to the serious breaches on the part of City Mamlatdar and take on the spot decision to act to prevent further damage to me and my rights. The situation is similar of a person drowning while the Life Guard is choosing to be a mute spectator while the person continuing to scream and shout for immediate assistance . The situation is also more or less like a firebrigade coming after everything has turned to ashes. Your words of comfort in the meeting on 28-2-2008 does not have any meaning in case you do not take immediate proactive action immediately without losing a single moment. * * * * * 5. This would enable you to arrive at immediate conclusion right away that the City Mamlatdar has passed Orders deliberately in undue haste and has extended favour to Harekrishna Developers and primaefacie indicating collusion with them while causing hardship and damage to my rights in the property leading to multiplicity of proceedings. In reality, The SWAGAT scheme is silently pursued by the City Mamlatdar for the benefit of builders like Harekrishna Developers and not for genuine common men in the city of Ahmedabad fighting for justice. * * 6. I am also reminded of famous story from Sherlock Holmes which is referred even by lawyers too . This is being reproduced as under :- Gregory (Scotland Yard <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_Yard> detective): “Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?” Holmes: “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.” Gregory: “The dog did nothing in the night-time.” Holmes: “That was the curious incident.” The City Mamlatdar has chosen not to bark and bite Harekrishna Developers (coming from builder community) very much means that the City Mamlatdar owes her loyalty to the Builder community as they are able to meet the expectations of the City Mamlatdar’s office especially when the Order dated 9th October 2007 is completely silent on my written submissions of 9thOctober 2007 amongst the Gist of breaches committed by the City Mamlatdar on my website link. 7. * I humbly request you to minutely go through the Order dated 9thOctober 2007 passed by the City Mamlatdar and quietly apply the test as under:- * “If a man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the host of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great street sweeper who did his job well.- Martin Luther king* “** * I am sure that you would also have no hesitation in rejecting the Order passed by the City Mamlatdar and you would be fuming mad too on account of such poor performance especially when she is not a novice in this field. 8. On account of serious and unpardonable conduct of the City Mamlatdar , it is necessary on the part of the Office of the Collector to take all the necessary additional steps immediately to prevent further damage to my rights especially when Harekrishna Developers has commenced construction on the disputed property and further delays would invite fresh multiplicity of legal proceedings unnecessarily and ultimately I may have to abandon fighting for my rights on account on account of inability to cope up at this age single handedly on account of health and lack of financial resources. * * 9. The misconduct on the part of the City Mamlatdar is so obvious that there is no option for you but to take suitable preventive action to protect my rights in the property while taking harsh measures against the City Mamlatdar. * * * * 10.I would appreciate very much if you would be kind enough to provide detailed reasoned reply by today evening of 26th March 2008 to the undersigned as well as to the Honorable Chief Minister of Gujarat indicating the preventive action steps being initiated by you to prevent further damage to me and my rights as referred in my earlier correspondence with you . Your immediate reply would help me decide further course of action.** * *** 11.I also feel that there might be other agencies who want to hamper my rights in the property in case the Collectorate office remains passive or turn blind eye by not taking swift and decisive action against City Mamlatdar and Harekrishna Developers. It goes without saying that Harekrishna Developers has misled the Collectorate office and has also suppressed vital facts to the Collectorate Office so as to manage Orders passed in its favour and commence construction on the property. Still there is time to take stern action against Harekrishna Developers ( and others) and the City Mamlatdar so that the spirit of Good Governance initiated by the Honorable Chief Minister meets the expectations of common men of Gujarat.** * * * ** * 12.Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email by your good self. * * Thanking you. * * * *Yours most respectfully, * * * Pankaj S Mody * * * ———- Forwarded message ———- From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com> Date: Mar 18, 2008 11:30 AM Subject: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR PURSUANT TO QUESTION 47 AND 48 RAISED IN FEBRUARY SCHEME OF SWAGAT BY COLLECTOR To: “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” <collector-ahd@gujarat.gov.in> NOTE:- I AM SENDING COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14-3-08 HAND DELIVERED TO THE COLLECTOR OFFICE ON 14-3-08. THE RECTIFICATION OF TEXT OF THE LETTER HAS BEEN CARRIED OUT HERE IN THE PRESENT EMAIL . THE EMAIL DOES NOT HAVE THE ANNEXURES ATTACHED IN THE EMAIL From:- Pankaj S Mody 2nd Floor, Janmangal Apt 40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006 Email modyps@gmail.com Dated:- 14-3-2008 To The Collector of Ahmedabad- For attention of Shri D. Diwedi Collector’s Office Shubash* Bridge* Ahmedabad Respected Sir, Subject:- Charges of Misconduct of CITY MAMLATDAR in Takrari Nodh Proceedings 74/07 relating to Final Plot 768/10, TP Scheme 3/5 varied, situated on C G Road , Ahmedabad in relation to Question 47 and 48 in SWAGAT MEETING ON 28-2-2008. and letter dated 28-2-08 submitted during the meeting ————————————– 1. I refer to my attendance upon your good self on 28-2-2008 wherein you requested me to reaffirm reformate the misconduct charges against City Mamlatdar which I am setting down herein below. I am also replying to several points replied by the City Mamlatdar on 27-2-2008 VIDE SCHEDULE “* PSM-A” annexed herewith and I am totally dissatisfied by her irresponsible and casual and indifferent reply . I am also bringing to you that the City Mamlatdar has evaded to give detailed findings referred under nine paragraphs as referred in my letter dated 26-2-2008 pertaining to the objection letter dated 30-5-2007. I am also referring to her misconduct against her in following paragraphs . I am also enclosing necessary documents herewith for your kind attention and referred at the end of this petition letter. 2. The City Mamlatdar received in 2007 ( dates unknown to me) in takrari nodh 407 pages. The details are as under :- · From Harekrishna Developers – 256 pages ( page no 9-37, 119-175, 181-337,347-355) * · From Talati/Circle Officer -34 pages in total ,(Page no 1 to 7, 39, 55, 57, 115, 391-407) . · Pankaj Mody – 117 pages in total ( 41-53, 59-113, 117, 177-179, 339. 341-345, 357-389 ) As per the records of Takrari Nodh records, I provided to Talati as well as City Mamlatdar/Talati’s office – about 117 pages of documents (strangely did not include letter dated 25-1-2006, 6-2-2007, 13-2-07,20-4-07, 16-5-07). For sake of reference , I am once again annexing copy of letter dated 25-1-2006 relating to registration of Lis Pendens document pertaining to Civil Suit 5827/2001 pending in Bhadra City Civil Court relating to the Final Plot 768/10. I am once again also annexing reply dated 13-2-2007 from the Circle Inspector ( Javak No 39/07). 3. The City Mamlatdar failed to ensure that I should receive copy of all the documents received by her from Harekrishna Developers and talati’s office namely 290 pages to enable me to consider the same and put up my stand interalia thereto. The City Mamlatdar on 29 September 2007 forwarded to my advocate Ms. Meena Vyas enclosures received by her from Harekrishna Developers totaling about 60 pages. On the same day, Harekrishna Developers also forwarded one more set being copy of said of about 60 pages vide their letter 29-9-07 ( Page no 347 of takrari nodh records) to Advocate Ms Meena Vyas. It seems that both Harekrishna Developers and the City Mamlatdar were working in tandem. Prior to 29-9-2007, the City Mamlatdar knew that she had not forwarded any documents to me. On 4-9-07 by my then Advocate (Ms Meena Vyas) had received vakilatnama and on 11-9-07 had requested copy of all documents requested received by the City Mamlatdar from Harekrihsna Developers .On 18-9-07 my lawyer requested for all such documents received from HAREKRISHNA DEVELOPERS and my lawyer informed that she would require 15 days from receipt of copy of each of Harekrishna Developers’ documents submitted by to City Mamlatdar. 4. I had no knowledge till November 7, 2007 that City Mmamlatdar had received altogether 407 pages of documents, which she considered in finalizing her Order dated 9th October 2007. Apart from about 60 pages received by me on 29-9-2007 by my lawyer Meena Vyas , neither I nor my lawyer had any knowledge of balance documents thereby seriously prejudicing me in presenting of my case to her. My then Lawyer and I had prepared Written Submissions on 9-10-07 based on 60 pages of documents received by her on 29-9-07 from City Mamlatdar and Harekrihsna Developers. The City Mamlatdar failed to ensure that I or my lawyer received that I or my said lawyer received additional 290 pages of documents prior to 9th october 2007. 5. The City Mamlatdar gravely mis conducted herself:- (a) On 3/10/2007 Mr. Deepak Vyas ( Advocate assistant of my lawyer) had handed over copy of Judgment of Honorable Justice Jayant Patel to City Mamlatdar ( Deepakbahi Manilal Patel against State of Gujarat) regarding directions to Mamlatdar for registering of Lis Pendens which I humbly submit the City Mamlatdar was obliged to follow being an inferior tribunal to Gujarat High Court. The City Mamlatdar did not comply with the said directions and failed to direct talati to register my Suit’s Lis Pendens. In her order dated 9-10-2007 , the City Mamlatdar has deliberately and wrongfully asserted at page 2 of her said Order ( first line of the said order) that “I had filed said SCA 16255/2006 ” which assertion was wholly baseless and untruthful. The City Mamlatdar ought to have known from the judgment of Honorable Justice Jayant Patel that I was not party to said proceedings and yet in her Order she has asserted and wrongfully concluded that I had lost SCA 16255/06. 6. No hearing date were given and no hearing took place before the said City Mamlatdar which is in violation of rules of natural justice and also amounts to Serious misconduct. The City Mamlatdar issued her Order on 9-10-2007 without any hearing and thereby prevented me and my lawyer to assert my stand and various legal and technical points and prevented cross examination of Harekrishna Developers and others who had submitted the afore stated 290 pages of documents. 7. The City Mamlatdar knew that being an inferior tribunal she has to comply with the judgment of supreme higher court, namely of Gujarat High Court in the said SCA 16255/2006. She deliberately and wrongfully evaded compliance of the same by deliberately misstating following wrongful facts in her order dated 9-10-2007:- · (i) That I had lost Civil Suit 5827/2001 in Bhadra City Civil Court. · (ii) Thereafter I appealed there from to Gujarat High Court which came for alleged hearing before two Judges and which I lost on 30-11-2006. · (iii) That Special Civil Application 16255/2006 was filed by me in Gujarat High Court and I had lost. NOTE :- None of the above three conclusions are truthful and no such evidence was ever given by me or by my two lawyers to the City Mamlatdar. 8. The City Mamlatdar failed to obtain from Harekrishna Developers or from the their lawyers A C Damani in support of their assertion (that I had lost my Civil Suit 5827/2001). I submit that she should have obtained appropriate Certificate from City Civil Court as regards alleged dismissal of my said Civil suit 5827/2001. All along I and my lawyers had informed the said City Mamlatdar and talati office right from January 2006 that my said Civil Suit 5827 of 2001 is pending in Bhadra City Civil Court and the same is subjudice. 9. The City Mamlatdar further gravely mis conducted herself in not preparing the following :- i. Index of documents consisting of page 1 to 407 referred to by her at last page of 9th October 2007. ii. Having discussions with Hare Krishna Developers and their lawyers unknown to me and my lawyers and in my lawyers’ and my absence. iii. Written records of all the discussions and meeting that took place between City Mamlatdar and Harekrishna Developers and /or their Lawyer (A C Damani) wherein City Mamlatdar was acting in judicial capacity. 10. Most of the documents tendered to Talati’s Office and City Mamlatdar by (Harekrishna Developers and others) requires authenticiation and the maker thereof to be crossexamined as the said documents are in contravention of various laws like Indian Evidence Act , Indian Registration Act, Indian Stamp Act, Transfer of Property Act, Bombay Revenue Code as applied to Gujarat etc. The City Mamlatdar should have looked into these documents before accepting the same. 11. Over and above her gross misconduct as referred above, I am narrating finer and additional misconduct of City Mamlatdar as under:- (a) Not granting Adjournment and hearing in the matter:- As per page No 347 ,Harekrishna Developers gave papers on 29-9-2007 to my advocate Ms. Meena Vyas and hence sufficient adjournment ought to have been given on 3-10-2007 on application made by my advocate. The City Mamlatdar arbitrarily decided not to give adjournment while orally stating that she would accept written submissions provided that the written submissions are submitted in next 8 to 10 days. The City Mamlatdar refused to give any fresh hearing at all. This shows that I am being purposely deprived of a hearing which is against principles of natural justice with a deliberate intention of causing me undue hardships , litigations and expense to extend undue favour to Harekrishna Developers so that they can carry on the construction activity. In reply dated 27-2-08 , the City Mamlatdar has given reply to Paragraph that the authorities did not have necessary details so as to register the Lis Pendens document The City Mamlatdar ought to be aware of the letter dated 25-1-2006 addressed to Circle Inspector and City Mamlatdar wherein necessary details have been given as regards to the document of Lis Pendens registered regarding the property with Sub Registrar’s office as regarding pending Civil suit in the referred disputed property. Once this fact was known to the authorities , it was the duty of City Mamaltdar to take on record Notice of Lis Pendens. (b) The City Mamlatdar has taken written submissions dated 9th October 2007 on record of takrari nodh but has not bothered to seek written clarifications from Harekrishna Developers in this regard which primae facie indicates that the City Mamlatdar had already decided in advance that she wants to pass order in favour of Harekrishna Developers and has taken care that no remarks are made in her Order dated 9th October 2007 as regards to my written submissions dated 9th October 2007 (submitted by me) so that such written submissions does not get observed later by higher authorities.All this clearly suggest that the City Mamlatdar was in collusion with Harekrishna Developers. (c) The City Mamlatdar has managed to inform about the Order dated 9th October 2007 to Harekrishna Developers prior to noon time of October 10th 2007 (As Advocate A C Damani filed caveat on 10th October 2007 for Harekrishna Developers), while I was served the Order by Post on 7th November 2007.This once again clearly points favor to Harekrishna Developers and clearly showing collusion with Harekrishna Developers. (d) The City Mamlatdar has taken on record my written statement dated 9th October 2007 (vide pages 357 to 389 ) and thereafter has also taken on record further documents ( vide pages 391-407 )without bringing the same to my notice. The City Mamlatdar office kept me in dark about vital documents received from Harekrishna Developers as well as other documents received such as page 349 ( entry 6027) , 351 , 353 ,355 which primae facie shows lack of transparency with a deliberate attempt to extend undue favour to Harekrishna Developers. The City Mamlatdar has also further taken on records various pages 391 to 407 while keeping me in dark. This is unfair as well as against Principles of natural justice. (e) It has been stated by City Mamlatdar that on 3rd Page of the Order dated 9th October 2007 , that Harekrishna Developers has presented to City Mamlatdar copy of registered release deed of charge. I am shocked that I was not informed about the same on 3rd October 2007 and I was not given an opportunity of being heard and this was done behind my back to extend undue favour to Harekrishna Developers. (f) It has been stated in the order dated 9th October 2007 that the only document of Civil Suit 5827 of 2001 that has been taken on record as submitted by Harekrishna Developers is the one relating to the Order passed on 25-11-2002. The City Mamlatdar has relied on this Order and going by the contents of the said Order dated 25-11-2002, it is clear that the said order was passed in my favor. (g) In view of objections raised by me,it was the duty of the City Mamlatdar to probe the entry 5512 regarding Span Medicals Ltd and also all the documents for creating charge on the property and also all the documents pertaining to lifting of the stay .It was duty of the City Mamlatdar to conduct thorough investigation and offer me an opportunity of cross examining before the order was passed.This has not been done. (h) The City Mamlatdar wants to shrug off the responsibility of examining the matter minutely and wants to pass on the burden to her superiors to spend their precious time. (i) The City Mamlatdar has not called for detailed explanation for taking entry 5611 on record and therefore the same has not been examined by the City Mamlatdar at all. (j) The City Mamlatdar has failed to give the index of page numbers( 1 to 407) forming part of takrari nodh 74/2007 before pronouncing the order on 9 th October 2007 and even now the same has not been made available by the City Mamlatdar. 12. It is needless to state that I as the objector should not be victimized on account of gross misconduct and collusion of City Mamlatdar and therefore I urge you to take all necessary steps so as to avoid multiplicity of legal proceedings. It was necessary for the City Mamlatdar to understand that prevention is better than cure. 13. I am annexing herewith for your attention and attention following documents:- i. Rojpatrak of Pending City Civil Suit 5827/2001. (page 9-23) ii. Copy of letter dated 25-1-06. (page 24) iii. Copy of letter from Circle Inspector dated 13-2-2006. (page 25) iv. Copy of Judgment by Honorable Justice Shri Jayant Patel in SCA 16255 of 2006 on 4-8-2006. ( page 26-28) v. Copy of written submissions on 9th October 2007.(page 29-38) vi. Copy of City Mamlatdar Order dated 9th October 2007. (page 39-41) vii. Copy of sale agreement of disputed property between Span Medicals Ltd and Harekrishna Developers-which is interalia not authentic and requires thorough scrutiny and needs cross examination of the makers (Copy obtained by me from the records office after the receipt of the Order dated 9th October 2007). (page 42-53) viii. Copy of Release deed on 8th October 2007 stamped on 9th October 2007 and obtained by me from the Records Office subsequently – which is interalia not authentic and requires thorough scrutiny and needs cross examination of the makers ( Copy obtained by me from the records office after receipt of the Order dated 9th October 2007). (page 54-57) ix. Remarks by City Mamlatdar on 27-2-2008 (page 57-61) x. SCEHUDULE A –in response to reply of City Mamlatdar on 27-2-2008 (page 61-65) xi. Copy of Letter DATED 28-2-2008 addressed to your goodself.(page 66-69) 14. In view of my petition , I humbly request you to take all effective steps so as to prevent multiplicity of legal proceedings so that I am not deprived of timely justice on account of misconduct of the City Mamlatdar. 15. I look forward to suitable prompt action in this regard. I look forward to your kind detailed reply in next two to three working days. Thanking you. Yours most respectfully, Pankaj S Mody

26-5-08 reply

mody — Mon, 26 May 2008 07:48:29 +0000

SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY :- Fwd: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE F

pankaj mody

Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM

To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in

Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in

SOS TOP PRIORITY REMINDER 1 FOR THE REVENUE SECRETARY

FROM :- PANKAJ S MODY
2ND FLOOR , JANMANGAL APT
40 BRAHMAN MITRA MANDAL SOCIETY
PALDI , AHMEDABAD 380006
EMAIL :- modyps@gmail.com

May 26 2008

The Revenue Secretary,
Government of Gujarat
GANDHINAGAR GUJARAT

Respected Sir,

Kindly refer to my earlier email dated 20th May 2008 which has not
been replied by you till date.

I once again request you to be kind enough to provide your detailed
reply promptly BY EMAIL latest by tomorrow afternoon

I do hope that your secretary would be kind enough to immediately
acknowledge receipt of present email to me

Thanking you

Yours most respectfully

Pankaj S Mody

Enclosure of email

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:19:36 +0530
Subject: MY COMMENTS TO THE REPLY DATED 30 4-2008 OF THE REVENUE DEPT
Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO
ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST
URGENT ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR P
To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in
Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in, “A.K.Sharma (IAS)” <sectocm@gujarat.gov.in>,
ustojs@gujarat.gov.in

From:- Pankaj S
Mody

2nd Floor, Janmangal Apt

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com

Dated 20th May 2008

To ,

The Revenue Secretary

Government of Gujarat

Gandhinagar

Respected Sir,

Your reference letter:- HKP-202008-1028-J dated 30th April , 2008
pursuant to letter from collector office dated 8-4-2008 bearing reference
cb/land/1/chadavad/2008/1 in relation to my letter dated 26-3-2008 in
relation to takrari nodh 74/07 pertaining to entry 5975 and 4913. .

Reference letter:- Jansampark reference letter vide 159539/2008 dated
11-3-2008 from the Jansampark office of the Chief Minister.

My earlier correspondence with the collector office is available on
www.psmody.wordpress.com .

—————————————————

1. Kindly refer to your letter brief letter dated 30–4-2008. My earlier
email dated 26-3-2008 is annexed herewith for ready reference.

2. I am totally dissatisfied by the brief reply given by the Revenue
Department.

3. It is apparent from your reply that your reply is a stereo reply
forcing me to incur cost on appeal on account of serious breaches negligence
of the City Mamlatdar.

4. I have approached the Collector office under their swagat scheme to
point point out the serious breaches of the City Mamlatdar.

5. I look forward to your independent detailed observations regarding the
contents of my earlier representation under SWAGAT SCHEME which would have
been done by now.

6. The City Mamlatdar Ms Mamta Sojitra must* have a remarkable stroke of
genius* in her in case she has studied my written submissions on
9thOctober 2007 and pass the Order the same day on 9
th October 2007. The said written observations on 9th October 2007 are
already on taken on record of 407 pages of documents in takrari nodh 74/07.

7. Kindly furnish detailed observations to myEMAILS instead of a brief
reply with a copy marked to me by tomorrow noon and to the Secretary to the
Chief Minister and the Office of Chief Minister at Jansampark so that the
issue can possibly be discussed in the upcoming Jansampark program being
possibly held on 22nd May 2008 , Thursday.

8. A copy of the present email is being marked to the Collector of
Ahmedabad so that he can submit his own independent observations to my
various representations in the emails under Swagat scheme of Collector.

9. I humbly request you to be kind enough to let me know in detail as to why
*the initiative* should be not taken by the Collector office and Revenue
department for quashing the order passed by the City Mamlatdar and steps
taken to protect my rights in the property as the construction has been
commenced by Harekrishna Developers.

10. The then collector- Mr Diwedi during the Swagat
meeting in March 2008 had informed to me that vigilance inquiry is being
conducted on the conduct of City Mamlatdar- Mamta Sojitra. I feel those
were just soothing words to console me. The inquiry has to be swift the way
Harbhajan Inquiry was concluded recently in the world of cricket as reported
in news papers. Under the present circumstances, to start with *she needs to
pay for all my legal expenses for appeal*. This does not come cheap and it
really pinches when the person is broke. Even a mentally strong person has
to begin considering the option of committing suicide. This is what is the
Collector office is suggesting to protect the corrupt City Mamlatdar like
Mamta Sojitra.

11. I am the last person to accept the stereo routine
reply of the Revenue Department for filing an appeal .I have come under
Swagat scheme of the Collector for rectifying glaring and obvious gross
negligence and misconduct of the City Mamlatdar. In case, you as a learned
Revenue Secretary is not able to see the glaring negligence and misconduct
of the City Mamlatdar, then the best thing is to gracefully opt for other
departments.

12. The Collector office is taking advantage of
the goodness
of the Honorable Chief Minister. What the Collector office needs is wrath
and fury of Ms Indira Gandhi whereby the shivers run down the spine of the
staff under the Collector office.

13. As a concerned citizen, I do not wish the image of
caring Hon’ble Chief Minister of Gujarat getting tarnished on account
of Trojan Horse ( one can easily make out from the conduct of the City
Mamlatdar Mamta Sojitra) in the Collectorate office especially when Shri
Narendrabhai treats all the citizens of Gujarat as part of his family.

Thanking you.

Yours most respectfully,

Pankaj S Mody

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2008 7:39 PM
Subject: Fwd: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS
TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT
ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR PURSUANT TO QUESTION 47 AND 48
RAISED IN FEBRUARY SCHEME OF SW
To: secrev@gujarat.gov.in
Cc: csguj@gujarat.gov.in, secpers@gujarat.gov.in, seclegal@gujarat.gov.in,
ustojs@gujarat.gov.in

*From :- *

*Pankaj S Mody*

*2nd Floor, Janmangal Apt*

*40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Society *

*Paldi, Ahmedabad 380006*

Email modyps@gmail.com

*Mobile** no 94270-26109*

*March 26, 2008 *

*The Revenue Secretary*

*Government of Gujarat *

*Gandhinagar*

Respected Sir,

*SUBJECT:- Letter from the Chief Minister’s office regarding Entry 5975 and
Entry 4913, *

1. This is in reference to the letter dated 11-3-08 received from the
Office of Jansampark of the Collector vide reference no 15953. The same is
annexed herewith for reference as per the internet link
http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev

2. I am marking copy of the correspondence with the Collector Office
under their Swagat programme for your independent observations , reference
and remarks. The correspondence with the Collector can be referred on my
blogsite internet link:- http://psmody.wordpress.com/ . Your office can
download the pages for ready reference as well read the messages online.

3. In this connection , I am drawing to your attention that the City
Mamlatdar has primarily ignored the entry 4913 present in the Record of
Right at the time of so called sale deed on 2-4-2007 . This is pertaining
to the stay of the Revenue Department. As long as this entry was present in
the record of right, the City Mamlatdar ought not to have passed any
further entries and in particular that of sale deed entry 5975 without
examining various issues in detail . I am afraid that this is not done. This
also shows that the City Mamlatdar considers herself to be above the Revenue
Department and does not have any regard for the Revenue Department which is
above her position. Such attitude of the City Mamlatdar cannot be tolerated
at all by the Revenue Department at all.

4. Secondly, the City Mamlatdar has totally ignored the spirit of
directions given by the Gujarat High Court as regards the registration of
Lis Pendens in the revenue records in light of the Orders passed by Order
passed by the Honourable Justice of Gujarat High Court Mr.Jayant Patel passed
on 4-8-2006 The same is annexed herewith for you ready reference in form
of internet link http://del.icio.us/mody08/swagat-annexure-21The City
Mamlatdar considers herself to be superior to Gujarat High Court which is
absurd. On account of negligence of the City Mamlatdar and the Collector
the entire bunglow has been demolished by Harekrishna Developers who has
misled and suppressed vital facts to obtain favourable orders. .

5. I am also referring to other gross misconduct on the part of City
Mamlatdar as referred on the internet link so that you can immediately
form an independent opinion and bring it to the notice of the Honorable
Chief Minister so that Honorable Chief Minister. The internet link is
annexed herewith for your ready reference *
http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-gist*

6. As a precautionary measure and as an interim measure , it is
absolutely necessary that you would be kind enough to take immediate
measures to protect my interest in the property on account of the pending
civil suit filed by me especially when the Sessions Court has issued
notices to the promoters of Span Medicals Limited to attend the Court
proceedings ( Span Medicals who in turn sold this property to Harekrishna
Developers- the subject matter of the entry 5975). It is absolutely
necessary *that you take lightining steps to seal the property and hold the
same in the custody of the Collectorate as an interim measure* preferably
by tomorrow as I foresee other parties pouncing on this property so as to
cause multiplicity of proceedings for me one after the other to protect my
rights.

7. I am extremely disappointed that the City Mamlatdar is not
concerned at all when the company is being High jacked in guise of
amalgamation with the help of Bunty aur Bubbly team ( starring Abhishek
and rani mukherjee) in real Life .

8. A copy of this correspondence will be brought to the notice of the
Gujarat High Court in case you decide to extend support to the serious and
gross breaches of violation of the City Mamlatdar and take the matter
lightly.

9. The copy of the email is also being marked to Jansampark for their
information.

10. Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email and be kind enough to
furnish your observations as every second and minute is important for me.
Therefore treat this as most important and most urgent.
11. I do expect that you are able to size up the situation
immediately especially
when the City Mamlatdar could dictate the Order on 9th October 2007 within one
to two hours of receipt of my written submissions on 9th October 2007
itself.- a remarkable achievement and a stroke of extraordinary genius -,
if I may say so !!!!.

Thanking you.

*
Yours sincerely, *

*
Pankaj S Mody *

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Mar 26, 2008 2:21 PM
Subject: SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO
ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR Fwd: SOS MESSAGE FOR MOST URGENT
ATTENTION :- COMPLAINT AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR PURSUANT TO QUESTION 47 AND 48
RAISED IN FEBRUARY SCHEME OF SWAGAT
To: “COLLECTOR,AHMEDABAD” <collector-ahd@gujarat.gov.in>

*( WITH HUMBLE REQUEST TO READ THE LETTER ON INTERNET ITSELF DIRECTLY SO AS
TO IMMEDIATELY SIZE UP THE SITUATION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT ANY
FURTHER DELAY) *