jump to navigation

SOS MESSAGE LETTER TO THE COLLECTOR BEFORE EVERY THING TURNS TO ASHES DUE TO BREACHES OF CITY MAMLATDAR March 26, 2008

Posted by mody in SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION -QUESTION 46-47.
add a comment

( WITH HUMBLE REQUEST TO READ THE LETTER ON INTERNET ITSELF DIRECTLY SO AS TO IMMEDIATELY SIZE UP THE SITUATION  FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY)   

 From:-                                                                                           PANKAJ S MODY

2ND FLOOR,

JANMANGAL APT

40 BRAHMAN MITRA MANDAL SOC 

PALDI, AHMEDABAD 380 006

Email modyps@gmail.com                                                                                                                          Mobile no 94270-26109  

 March 26, 2008                   

To,  

 The Collector of Ahmedabad

Collector Office

Subhash Bridge

Ahmedabad        

NOTE:- ( WITH HUMBLE REQUEST TO READ THE  LETTER   ON INTERNET ITSELF DIRECTLY SO AS TO IMMEDIATELY SIZE UP THE SITUATION FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION  WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY)   

Respected Sir,

   SUBJECT:- IN RELATION TO  QUESTION 47 AND 48 PURSUANT TO MY PETITION LETTER DATED 5-2-2008  UNDER SWAGAT SCHEME OF COLLECTOR OF AHMEDABAD  

  REFERENCE LETTER:- Chief Minister’s Office communication dated 11-3-08 (file number 159539/08) ( INTERNET LINK:- http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev)  is  pertaining to the entry 4913 and 5975 in record of right passed by City Mamlatdar on 9th October 2007 under takrari nodh 74/07.   

 SOME OF REFERENCE  INTERNET LINKS :-  

DETAILS INTERNET LINK
30-5-07 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-30-5-07
9-10-07 LETTER WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS 9-10-07
5-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-5-2-08 
26-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-26-2-08
27-2-08 reply http://del.icio.us/mody08/27-2-08-FROM-MAMLAT
28-2-08 LETTER http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-28-2-08
14-3-08 LETTER and major annexures link http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-14-3-08-mamhttp://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-14-3-08-annex-link 
 Gist of complaint against city mamlatdar http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-gist 
Summary of communication to collector in SWAGAT SCHEME http://del.icio.us/mody08/sum-com-q47-q48 

 ————————————————-

1.    This is in reference to the meeting held under Swagat Program by you on 28-2-08 in relation to my questions 47 and 48.During the meeting, I had given very important letter dated 28-2-08 to you IN PERSON  so that you are  able to probe the matter minutely WHEREBY  you can get insights of how the system works in the Collectorate office   to perform SWAGAT TO BUILDER COMMUNITY  such as Harekrishna Developers. I am eager to have your detailed findings in relation to my above letter dated 28-2-2008.   

2.    I have also received recently from the Chief Minister’s Office communication dated 11-3-08 (file number 159539/08) which is pertaining to the entry 4913 and 5975 in record of right. The  letter from  Office of the Chief Minister is as per the internet link as :-      http://del.icio.us/mody08/JS-REPLY-11-3-08-rev 

3.    As discussed on 28-2-08 during the meeting with you, I have already sent on 14-3-08 comprehensive complaint against present City Mamlatdar- Ms Mamta Sojitra on account of the orders passed on 9th October 2007 in relation  to  Takrai Nodh 74/07 in favour of Harekrishna Developers. The said letter dated 14-3-08 had minor errors and hence the said letter has been rectified while revised copy was sent on 18-3-08 by email to you and was also hand delivered in the Collector  Office on 19-3-08.I have also given my observations and remarks to the reply given by the City Mamlatdar on 27-2-08 in my letter dated 14-3-08 in the enclosure thereto. It was necessary for the office of City Mamlatdar as well as the Talati and Circle Inspector to warn Span Medicals and others so that the property do not get sold or  demolished in light of Lis Pendens registered with the Sub Registrar office as [part of Good Governance measures especially when assurance was given by the Circle officer on 13-2-07 that they are not going to pass any fresh entry by  taking note of presence of my pending Civil Suit.  

     4.     I am posting the letter dated 14-3-08 annexing most of the enclosures by way of internet links so that you are simultaneously able to quickly  assess and size up the  subject  matter effectively on online  INTERNET itself especially to  the serious  breaches on the part of City Mamlatdar and take on the spot decision to act to prevent further damage to me and my rights. The situation is similar of a person drowning while the Life Guard is choosing to be a mute spectator  while the person continuing to scream and shout  for immediate assistance . The situation is also more or less like  a firebrigade coming after everything has turned to ashes. Your words of comfort in the meeting on 28-2-2008 does not have any meaning in case you do not take immediate proactive action immediately without losing a single moment.   

5.    This would enable you to arrive at immediate conclusion right away that the City Mamlatdar has passed Orders deliberately  in undue haste and has extended favour to Harekrishna Developers and primaefacie  indicating collusion with them while  causing  hardship and damage to my rights in the property leading to  multiplicity of proceedings. In reality, The SWAGAT scheme is silently pursued by the City Mamlatdar for the benefit of builders like Harekrishna Developers and not for genuine common men in the city of Ahmedabad fighting for justice. 

6.    I am also reminded of famous story from Sherlock Holmes which is referred even by lawyers too . This is being reproduced as under :- Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): “Is there any other point to which you would   wish to draw my attention?” Holmes: “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.” Gregory: “The dog did nothing in the night-time.” Holmes: “That was the curious incident.” The City Mamlatdar has chosen not to bark and bite Harekrishna Developers (coming  from builder community)  very much  means that  the City Mamlatdar owes her loyalty to the Builder community as they are able to meet the expectations of the City Mamlatdar’s office  especially when the Order dated 9th October 2007 is completely silent on my written submissions of 9th October 2007 amongst the Gist of breaches committed by the City Mamlatdar  on my website link.   

7.      I humbly request you to minutely go through the  Order dated 9th October 2007 passed by the City Mamlatdar  and quietly apply the test  as under:- “If a man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets  even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the host of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great street sweeper who did his job well.- Martin Luther king “ I am sure that you would also have no hesitation in rejecting the Order passed by the  City Mamlatdar and you would be  fuming mad too on account of such poor performance especially when she is not a novice in this field.   

8.    On account of serious and unpardonable conduct of the City Mamlatdar , it is necessary on the part of the Office of the Collector to take all the   necessary   additional steps immediately   to  prevent further damage to my rights  especially when Harekrishna Developers has commenced  construction on the disputed property   and  further delays would invite fresh multiplicity of legal proceedings unnecessarily  and ultimately I may have to abandon fighting for my rights on account on account of inability to cope up at this age single handedly  on account of  health and  lack of financial resources.  

 9.    The misconduct on the part of the City Mamlatdar is so obvious  that there is no option   for you  but to take suitable preventive action to protect my rights in the property while taking  harsh measures against the City Mamlatdar.  

10.I would appreciate very much if you would be kind enough to provide detailed reasoned  reply by today  evening of 26th March 2008 to the undersigned as well as to the Honorable Chief Minister of Gujarat  indicating the preventive action steps being  initiated by you to prevent further damage to me and my rights  as referred in my earlier correspondence with you . Your immediate reply would help me decide further course of action. 

11.I also feel that there might be other agencies who want to hamper my rights in the property in case the Collectorate office remains passive or turn blind eye by not taking swift and decisive action against City Mamlatdar and Harekrishna Developers. It goes without saying that Harekrishna Developers has  misled the Collectorate office and has also suppressed vital facts to the Collectorate Office so as to manage Orders passed in its favour and commence construction on the property. Still there is time to take stern action  against Harekrishna Developers ( and others)  and the  City Mamlatdar so that the name of the Honorable Chief Minister does not get tarnished.        

 12.Kindly acknowledge receipt of the present email by your good self.    

Thanking you.                                    

                          Yours most respectfully,                                                                     Pankaj S Mody                                                                         

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION -QUESTION 47-48 March 25, 2008

Posted by mody in SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION -QUESTION 46-47, SWAGAT-COLLECTOR -FEBRUARY.
comments closed

   

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION IN RELATION TO QUESTION 47-48 OF SWAGAT-COLLECTOR-FEBRUARY

1.     The City Mamlatdar ought to have maintained patience before passing Orders on 9th October 2007 in a hurry . The best way to describe the wisdom of patience is referred in two link background. http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-wisdom , http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-wisdom-impulse-decision

2.     I had  submitted objection letter dated 30-5-2007-    http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-30-5-07 along with annexures-  http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-30-5-07-table-annex

3.     I had made petition in Swagat scheme of Collector on 5-2-08- (  http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-5-2-08 )  pursuant  to adverse orders passed by City Mamlatdar especially when the particulars referred in letter dated 30-5-07 were not investigated by City Mamlatdar. I had submitted written submissions on 9th October 2007 to the City Mamlatdar but the same were ignored by the City Mamlatdar.

4.     Pursuant to my letter dated 26-2-07(  http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-26-2-08 ) ,  the City Mamlatdar gave a reply on 27-2-08 (http://del.icio.us/mody08/27-2-08-FROM-MAMLAT  ) .  

 5.     I had addressed letter dated 28-2-2008 to the Collector (http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-28-2-08 ) so that detailed investigation can be carried out to find out various clues.

6.      I had submitted comprehensive complaint against City Mamaltdar on 14-3-08-  ( contents rectified on 18-3-08 and submitted  on 19-3-08) along with annexures     http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-14-3-08-annex-link )    along with my  reply ( http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-p-sch-a ) to the reply dated 27-2-08 of City Mamlatdar.

7.     The GIST  of MY GRIEVANCE   against City Mamlatdar is given in the internet link as under SO AS TO SIZE UP THE SITUATION IMMEDIATELY :- http://del.icio.us/mody08/wp-psm-w-gist      

SWAGAT SCHEME-COLLECTOR-PERTAINING TO CITY MAMLATDAR March 2, 2008

Posted by mody in SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION -QUESTION 46-47, SWAGAT-COLLECTOR -FEBRUARY.
comments closed

 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE BUNGLOW DEMOLISHED

 

 

INTERNET LINK TO LOCATION OF PROPERTY AS UNDER:-

LOCATION OF THE DISPUTED PROPERTY

 

  1. The Collector of  Ahmedabad would have come to following conclusions by now  after the Swagat Meeting on 28-2-08  that the  city mamlatdar has not perfromed the duties impartially with open and receptive mind in a diligent manner.
  2. Why should the ordinary citizen like me  be penalised ( in terms of time , legal expense, harrassment and tension )  on account of glaring blunders on account of  serious breaches and misconduct on the part of the City Mamlatdar defying all the  principles of natural justice. 
  3. The citizen expects effective redressal of grievance  from the Collector office. It is obvious that automatic  internal   vigilance measures and audit measures  are not carried out  missing  once the orders passed jeopardising the property  rights which can ruin a family and create serious  social disorder within the family and outside the family especially when the Lis Pendens document entry is not passed in the revenue records as soon as the same are filed with the sub registrar’s office. The negligence is to open window for corruption. 
  4.   By now the Collector ought to SIZE up the situation and it is expected of the  Collector   to take all interim measures of   effective steps (A)  TO IMMEDIATELY PREVENT  further construction  on the property by Harekrishna Developers  so that my rights do not get affected adversely and I do not have to get into multiplicity of legal proceedings.
  5. The spirit of Good Governance in Government of Gujarat  can materialize only when the persons such as City  Mamlatdar has passion for details and  excellence  , urgency as well as patience, inquisitiveness and curiosity ,  zeal for  doing job well  so that the important rights to property of affected persons do not get affected adversely on account of indifference and lack of an  Open Receptive Mind.
  6.  The sunlight can enter the room provided the windows are opened out and in a similar manner , it is necessary that the  windows of mind need to open out so that effective decision can be taken and the common person does not have to run from pillar to post.
  7.  There has to be patience of patience of tortoise and not agility of  HARE   while making such important decision on the grievance raised by the objector.
  8.  The need of the Hour is CATCHING  BULL ( the Builder Harekrihsna Developers)  BY THE HORNS  before it is too late and need use appropriate whip and reigns.   Then only the TRUE  SPIRIT of SWAGAT MATERIALISE FOR COMMON PERSONS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE AND EXISTENCE. 
  9. As there is evasion of large scale stamp duty and as there is there was VIOALTION OF  Revenue stay in light of Entry 4913 existing EVEN at the time of sale deed on 2-4-2007 , there is absolute need to hold the property in the custody of the Collector so that the investigation can be carried out. THIS IS COMMON SENSE PRECAUTIONS.      

(more…)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.