ISSUES RAISED IN SWAGAT SCHEME OF COLLECTOR -AHMEDABAD

GIST OF MY GRIEVANCES AGAINST CITY MAMLATDAR:- March 22, 2008

My serious objections on the conduct of  City Mamlatdar ( Ahmedabad)–Ms Mamta Sojitra is briefly narrated in following paragraphs indicating  gross negligence  as well as outright collusion with Builders Harekrishna Developers and cause irreparable damage to my rights in the property and make an elderly head of the family  (fighting single handedly without financial resources as a full time activity for existence and survival) to GO NUTS AND CRAZY  on account of undue haste by City Mamlatdar of SWAGAT TO BUILDER–HAREKRISHNA DEVELOPERS and thereby  EXPOSING ME AND MY FAMILY  TO RISK OF  THREATS AND HARASSMENT FROM SEVERAL PARTIES WHO CAN VERY EASILY ENGAGE ANTISOCIAL ELEMENTS    ONCE THE PREOPERTY IS  FULLY DEVELOPED AND OCCUPIED :-

1. The City Mamlatdar does not want to honour the word given by circle inspector of madalpur in  its letter dated  13-2-2007  VIDE OUTWARD NO 39/07 that note is being placed on record of right   as  civil suit 5827/2001  is pending and no further changes will be made in record of right.
2.    City Mamlatdar did not register my lis pendens document even when the letter dated 25-1-2006 and 6-2-2007  with copy of Index was written and  on account of such negligence the bunglow has been demolished and resulting in multiplicity of legal proceedings while I have to remain a mute spectator to the construction initiated by the builder.  
3. City Mamlatdar being an inferior tribunal is bound to honour   the directions given by Gujarat High Court’s Justice Jayant Patel (Deepakbahi Manilal Patel against State of Gujarat)           Judgment dated 4^th August 2006 in Special Civil Application 16255/2006  relating to registering of Lis Pendens document in Record of Right by Mamlatdars in order to give effect to Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act. City Mamlatdar totally disregarded the said judgment of Gujarat High Court which is superior court to over that of City Mamlatdar. In view of the High Court Judgment the Lis Pendens ought to have been taken on record as a matter of policy to prevent further litigations and hardships  and also to restrain possibility of corruption as a TOOL OF  INTRODUCING GOOD GOVERNANCE FOR THE BENEFIT OF COMMON MEN.
4. The City Mamlatdar is not interested  in  probing in detail inspite of instructions given by City Mamlatdar  to talati/circle inspector vide outward no 2686 dated 5-6-2007 as referred in remarks to objection letter 30-5-2007.Once the instructions have been given to investigate the matter it cannot be withdrawn. Besides, it was necessary that follow up measures of monitoring the progress was supervised thereafter. Under no circumstances the truth should have been buried.   
5. The City Mamlatdar deliberately ignored the pending civil suit 5827/2001 (which is subjudice) so as to extend favour the builder and extant( alive) in the Record of Right.  
6. The City Mamlatdar did not take following necessary steps  after receiving my written submissions given on 9^th October 2007 .

       (i)         Obtaining list of documents     and  affidavits verifying the same of both the parties.

     (ii)    Obtaining written reply from builders -Harekrishna Developers to  written submission of 9^th October 2007

      (iii)               Failing to ensure that I receive copy of each balance 230 pages  or more of documents  being part of 407 pages of documents  read by her.   

     (iv)              Attending several times upon the builders and /or their lawyers without the knowledge of my lawyer and myself and behind my back.

    (v)         Refusing to hold a hearing in the matter.

   7.  The City Mamlatdar does not dispatch the copy of the orders simultaneously to both the parties but hands over the order to Harekrishna Developers first  while delaying the dispatch for almost month to me.

1. The City Mamlatdar refuses to give further adjournment on 3-10-2007.  
2. The City Mamlatdar does not want to honour the directions given by  revenue authorities that there is stay on the property as per the entry 4913 in record of right and the said entry is being reflected at the time of  so called sale deed in record of right .  
3. The City Mamlatdar acted in contravention of Rules of Natural Justice and fair play.
4. The City Mamlatdar acted on non-evidence and/or on lies and imaginary facts.
5. The City Mamlatdar failed to refer to the sale agreement dated 2^nd April 2007 to Superintendent of Stamps for adjudication as the disputed property (on C G Road,Ahmedabad ) value in 2007 exceeded over Rs 20 crores when the sale deed is only Rs 7.5 crores even when her attention was drawn by me as per my written submission dated 9^th October 2007.
6. The City Mamlatdar dispatched the Orders to Harekrishna Developers prior to 10^th October 2007  while the Order was dispatched to me on 5^th November 2007 which also indicates collusion by City Mamlatdar with Harekrishna Developers and their advocates.